Мнение судей..

[Sphynxx]

В комментариях к этой статье (http://strategy.channelfireball.com/featured-articles/tolarian-academy-youre-talking-a-lot-but-youre-not-saying-anything/ , статья хорошая, всем рекомендую) приведены несколько потенциально неодноззначных ситуаций, связанных с коммуникацией между игроками. Хотелось бы узнать мнение практикующих судей о том, насколько легальны описанные там ситуации.

 

А вот и сами ситуации:

 

Ex. 1

“What is that?” (pointing to Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth)

“It’s a Swamp.”

 

Ex. 2

“What does it do?” (Craw Wurm equipped with Magebane Armor)

“It has no abilities.”

 

Ex. 3

“Can I tap your Serra Angel with Blinding Mage?”

“You can do it after attackers are declared.”

 

Ex. 4

“Explain how deathtouch interacts with the new combat damage rules again?”

 

Ex. 5

“Lightning Bolt.”

“Are you targeting me or Jace?”

“You.”

(redirects damage to Jace upon resolution)

[amarto]

- Что случилось с вашей подлодкой, мистер Путин?

- Она утонула.

[Nova]

Ex. 1

“What is that?” (pointing to Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth)

“A piece of paper”

 

Ex. 2

“What does it do?” (Craw Wurm equipped with Magebane Armor)

“Nothing. Just lying on the table.”

 

Ex. 3

“Can I tap your Serra Angel with Blinding Mage?”

“Try to do this"

[Tinefol]

Ex. 1

“What is that?” (pointing to Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth)

“A piece of paper”

 

Ex. 2

“What does it do?” (Craw Wurm equipped with Magebane Armor)

“Nothing. Just lying on the table.”

 

КО удавился от зависти.

 

Ex. 3

“Can I tap your Serra Angel with Blinding Mage?”

“You ask Blinding Mage!”